<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments for Kingsdown Conservation Group</title>
	<atom:link href="http://kingsdown.org.uk/comments/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://kingsdown.org.uk</link>
	<description>Preserving and Enhancing Kingsdown, Bristol</description>
	<pubDate>Wed, 20 Aug 2008 18:27:51 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.6</generator>
		<item>
		<title>Comment on Residents&#8217; Parking Scheme - a note from KCG Committee by Steve Loughran</title>
		<link>http://kingsdown.org.uk/2008/07/26/residents-parking-scheme-a-note-from-kcg-committee/#comment-4573</link>
		<dc:creator>Steve Loughran</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 26 Jul 2008 16:43:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://kingsdown.org.uk/?p=236#comment-4573</guid>
		<description>I'm not going to hold an opinon on a CPZ in kingsdown; I think over in Cotham we are more against it. Because its a lot of money and a great loss of freedom for no clear benefit -at least to anyone who has offstreet parking or doesnt want to park their car during working hours.

However, and if you follow the link to the Bristol Traffic site above you can see- is that a lot of the parking on pavements, double yellow lines and keep clear zones in kingsdown is actually done by locals. You can see this by photographing the cars and then coming back a week later, or at weekends. The cars are still there. These are not commuters, they are yourselves. 

What would make a difference today would be something resembling enforcement of parking rules. If commuters and residents knew there was a 50% chance of being ticketed for parking illegally on any day they did it, they wouldn't. This could actually increase pressure from residents for a CPZ; suddenly all the 'resident only' parking slots would be gone.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;m not going to hold an opinon on a CPZ in kingsdown; I think over in Cotham we are more against it. Because its a lot of money and a great loss of freedom for no clear benefit -at least to anyone who has offstreet parking or doesnt want to park their car during working hours.</p>
<p>However, and if you follow the link to the Bristol Traffic site above you can see- is that a lot of the parking on pavements, double yellow lines and keep clear zones in kingsdown is actually done by locals. You can see this by photographing the cars and then coming back a week later, or at weekends. The cars are still there. These are not commuters, they are yourselves. </p>
<p>What would make a difference today would be something resembling enforcement of parking rules. If commuters and residents knew there was a 50% chance of being ticketed for parking illegally on any day they did it, they wouldn&#8217;t. This could actually increase pressure from residents for a CPZ; suddenly all the &#8216;resident only&#8217; parking slots would be gone.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Marlborough Hill 830am by Tony Kerr</title>
		<link>http://kingsdown.org.uk/2008/06/17/marlborough-hill-830am/#comment-4242</link>
		<dc:creator>Tony Kerr</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 17 Jun 2008 17:16:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://kingsdown.org.uk/2008/06/17/marlborough-hill-830am/#comment-4242</guid>
		<description>Good point, Steve, thanks.

Laing O'Rourke (the contractors building the Heart Institute) responded very quickly this morning when we mentioned the problem to them, and they have again reminded their regular suppliers, and courier firms, that deliveries to the site are meant to go via the Horfield Rd site.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Good point, Steve, thanks.</p>
<p>Laing O&#8217;Rourke (the contractors building the Heart Institute) responded very quickly this morning when we mentioned the problem to them, and they have again reminded their regular suppliers, and courier firms, that deliveries to the site are meant to go via the Horfield Rd site.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Marlborough Hill 830am by Steve Loughran</title>
		<link>http://kingsdown.org.uk/2008/06/17/marlborough-hill-830am/#comment-4230</link>
		<dc:creator>Steve Loughran</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 17 Jun 2008 10:35:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://kingsdown.org.uk/2008/06/17/marlborough-hill-830am/#comment-4230</guid>
		<description>Its a bit chaotic as today is the first day that Cotham Brow is fully closed for traffic. Go take a look at the bottom of Nugent Hill and see how many cars have opt to ignore the no-entry sign to see another consequence.

I do agree with the lorry restriction though.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Its a bit chaotic as today is the first day that Cotham Brow is fully closed for traffic. Go take a look at the bottom of Nugent Hill and see how many cars have opt to ignore the no-entry sign to see another consequence.</p>
<p>I do agree with the lorry restriction though.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Is this what we want to see on Horfield Road? by Tony Kerr</title>
		<link>http://kingsdown.org.uk/2008/05/03/is-this-what-we-want-to-see-on-horfield-road/#comment-3710</link>
		<dc:creator>Tony Kerr</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 07 May 2008 15:12:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://kingsdown.org.uk/?p=202#comment-3710</guid>
		<description>We have emailed the following reply to you:

Our source is Hannah Smith, Planning Officer who co-ordinated the review of the Conservation Area Character Appraisal. We checked the current status of the extra triangle directly with her, and she confirmed that it is now included in the Conservation Area, following the consultation on the Draft Appraisal.

I have copied this to her, to give you her email address, and if you find out that we have been misinformed pleae let me know and I will, of course, change the item.

With regard to the second statement that we consider wrong, my impression is that both you, and UBHT as your clients, genuinely believe that you have 'done the right thing' just by showing us the draft plans, though you will also be aware that simply ignoring our concerns and saying they are best dealt with through the planning system, is hardly 'involvement' in the normal sense of the word. However, this approach falls far short of what Bristol, in line with many other councils, is now expecting from developers, but we are still optimistic that, with proper involvement, we can save everyone's time (and some money) by helping to develop schemes that we can then simply support.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>We have emailed the following reply to you:</p>
<p>Our source is Hannah Smith, Planning Officer who co-ordinated the review of the Conservation Area Character Appraisal. We checked the current status of the extra triangle directly with her, and she confirmed that it is now included in the Conservation Area, following the consultation on the Draft Appraisal.</p>
<p>I have copied this to her, to give you her email address, and if you find out that we have been misinformed pleae let me know and I will, of course, change the item.</p>
<p>With regard to the second statement that we consider wrong, my impression is that both you, and UBHT as your clients, genuinely believe that you have &#8216;done the right thing&#8217; just by showing us the draft plans, though you will also be aware that simply ignoring our concerns and saying they are best dealt with through the planning system, is hardly &#8216;involvement&#8217; in the normal sense of the word. However, this approach falls far short of what Bristol, in line with many other councils, is now expecting from developers, but we are still optimistic that, with proper involvement, we can save everyone&#8217;s time (and some money) by helping to develop schemes that we can then simply support.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Is this what we want to see on Horfield Road? by O'LearyGoss Architects</title>
		<link>http://kingsdown.org.uk/2008/05/03/is-this-what-we-want-to-see-on-horfield-road/#comment-3709</link>
		<dc:creator>O'LearyGoss Architects</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 07 May 2008 13:23:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://kingsdown.org.uk/?p=202#comment-3709</guid>
		<description>As far as I am aware the site on Horfield Road under discussion is not within the Kingsdown Conservation Area ( see chapter 6 of the Bristol Local Plan, page 25 for map). Therefore the statement within the UBHT planning application is not 'wrong'. If my information is incorrect please could you refer me to your sources; if correct please amend your article.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>As far as I am aware the site on Horfield Road under discussion is not within the Kingsdown Conservation Area ( see chapter 6 of the Bristol Local Plan, page 25 for map). Therefore the statement within the UBHT planning application is not &#8216;wrong&#8217;. If my information is incorrect please could you refer me to your sources; if correct please amend your article.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Should the Jester stay or go? by carin kerr</title>
		<link>http://kingsdown.org.uk/2008/03/07/should-the-jester-stay-or-go/#comment-3694</link>
		<dc:creator>carin kerr</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 25 Apr 2008 14:05:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://kingsdown.org.uk/2008/03/07/should-the-jester-stay-or-go/#comment-3694</guid>
		<description>Its lovely and there are too few statues anyway or did the council offer us a replacement maybe?
 Anything that enhances the rather uninspiring little park  must be good and people stop to look at it and photograph it all the time. We live very close to the Jester and everybody in our place thinks its good fun. 
Anyway why does the council turn down an application that a big majority voted for?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Its lovely and there are too few statues anyway or did the council offer us a replacement maybe?<br />
 Anything that enhances the rather uninspiring little park  must be good and people stop to look at it and photograph it all the time. We live very close to the Jester and everybody in our place thinks its good fun.<br />
Anyway why does the council turn down an application that a big majority voted for?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Should the Jester stay or go? by Graham Staples</title>
		<link>http://kingsdown.org.uk/2008/03/07/should-the-jester-stay-or-go/#comment-3693</link>
		<dc:creator>Graham Staples</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 25 Apr 2008 12:10:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://kingsdown.org.uk/2008/03/07/should-the-jester-stay-or-go/#comment-3693</guid>
		<description>A positive contribuiton to the area. It should stay.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>A positive contribuiton to the area. It should stay.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Should the Jester stay or go? by caroline</title>
		<link>http://kingsdown.org.uk/2008/03/07/should-the-jester-stay-or-go/#comment-3692</link>
		<dc:creator>caroline</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 23 Apr 2008 20:55:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://kingsdown.org.uk/2008/03/07/should-the-jester-stay-or-go/#comment-3692</guid>
		<description>keep the jester, its nice</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>keep the jester, its nice</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Basque Refugee Children in Kingsdown, 1937 by Penny Mellor</title>
		<link>http://kingsdown.org.uk/2007/09/21/basque-refugee-children-in-bristol-1937/#comment-3587</link>
		<dc:creator>Penny Mellor</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 05 Mar 2008 14:10:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://kingsdown.org.uk/2007/09/21/basque-refugee-children-in-bristol-1937/#comment-3587</guid>
		<description>The children were refugees from the Spanish Civil War - sent by their parents from Bilbao in 1936.  They stayed at no.10 Kingsdown Parade, previously the Institution for Deaf Children, for a year when the war was at its peak in the Basque area, before returning home once the worst of the fighting was over.  

(The Basque area was keenly fought over: Bilbao had declared for the left wing Republicans at the start of the war and its capture in 1937 was an important victory for the right wing Nationalists.  In April 1937, the nearby ancient city of the Basques – Guernica – was bombed and destroyed in the first ever deliberate aerial bombing of a city.)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The children were refugees from the Spanish Civil War - sent by their parents from Bilbao in 1936.  They stayed at no.10 Kingsdown Parade, previously the Institution for Deaf Children, for a year when the war was at its peak in the Basque area, before returning home once the worst of the fighting was over.  </p>
<p>(The Basque area was keenly fought over: Bilbao had declared for the left wing Republicans at the start of the war and its capture in 1937 was an important victory for the right wing Nationalists.  In April 1937, the nearby ancient city of the Basques – Guernica – was bombed and destroyed in the first ever deliberate aerial bombing of a city.)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on UBHT proposals to develop 4 Kingsdown sites by peteferne</title>
		<link>http://kingsdown.org.uk/2008/03/03/ubht-proposals-to-develop-4-kingsdown-sites/#comment-3585</link>
		<dc:creator>peteferne</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 03 Mar 2008 22:54:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://kingsdown.org.uk/2008/03/03/ubht-proposals-to-develop-4-kingsdown-sites/#comment-3585</guid>
		<description>The link above (&lt;a id="p180" href="http://kingsdown.org.uk/wp-content/uploads/2008/03/UBHT_response.doc" rel="nofollow"&gt;UBHT response&lt;/a&gt;) is working again now.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The link above (<a id="p180" href="http://kingsdown.org.uk/wp-content/uploads/2008/03/UBHT_response.doc" rel="nofollow">UBHT response</a>) is working again now.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
